Investigation professionals was indeed 237 males and 248 female (N = 485) who had been mind-announced heterosexual
Although there try consistent and you will convergent medical literature on accessory principle as well as the negative and positive reflexes your safe and you can vulnerable appearances, correspondingly, bring about within the married life, zero degree have been learned that additionally checked the brand new parameters stated in the this research, exhibiting those dichotomously discriminate this new attachment build in addition to the new magnitude out of discrimination. Distinguishing the team of affairs one to characterizes each of the connection appearance and you can appearing which factors feel the most useful strength from discrimination would-be a relevant result that can point out research and you will intervention agendas for couples psychotherapy.
In this experience, the purpose of this research was to determine whether or not the communication, relationship modifications, quality, frequency and you may intensity of disputes parameters do discriminate individuals with safer and you may insecure accessory inside heterosexual dating. Thus, new theory checked try your bad interaction, tips regarding assault and you can prevention, regularity and you will intensity of disputes details would define group because the individuals with vulnerable attachment, additionally the open communication, opinion, satisfaction, cohesion and you will marital changes, in addition to agreement parameters do characterize her or him just like the individuals with safe connection appearance.
Players
This can be a decimal, cross-sectional analysis that makes use of a descriptive and explanatory structure. The minimum period of male candidates try 20 and the limit are 79 (M = ; SD = ). The minimum age of women participants is 18 and the limitation is 76 (Yards = ; SD = ) ( Desk step one).
Tool
1) Sociodemographic questionnaire: New survey of the sociodemographic characteristics of members are carried out as a result of a questionnaire that have 14 issues one examined: ages, sexual orientation, host to home, marital status, period of latest matchmaking, lifetime off a past matchmaking, duration of past matchmaking, studies, functioning outside the domestic, workload, personal earnings, quantity of children and you may faith.
2) Experience in Close Relationship – Reduced (ECR-R-Brazil) ( Natividade Shiramizu, 2015 Natividade, J. C., Shiramizu, V. K. M. (2015). Uma medida de apego: versao brasileira da Experiences in Close Relationship Scale-Reduzida (ECR-R-Brasil). Psicologia USP, 26(3), 484-494. ): The scale assesses the anxiety and avoidance of attachment factors in the marital relationship. The ECR-R-Brazil has affirmative phrases that respondents must categorize on a seven-point Likert scale that ranges from “strongly agree” to seven “strongly disagree”. The scale has ten items, five on the anxiety factor and five on the avoidance factor. In the analysis of the main components of the items of the ECR-R-Brazil carried out in the study by Natividade and Shiramizu (2015) Natividade, J. C., Shiramizu, V. K. M. (2015). Uma medida de apego: versao brasileira da Experiences in Close Relationship Scale-Reduzida (ECR-R-Brasil). Psicologia USP, 26(3), 484-494. , with good data adequacy, Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) = 0.80; Bartlett’s sphericity test, ? 2 (66, N = 4.879) = ; p < 0.001. The final model from the confirmatory factor analysis showed an optimal fit, as pointed out in the study: ? 2 = 101.8; Degrees of freedom (df) = 25; p = < 0.001; ? 2 /df = 4.07; Goodness-of-Fit Index (GFI) = 0990; Adjusted Goodness-of-Fit Index (AGFI) = 0.990; Normed Fit Index (NFI) = 0.990; Tucker–Lewis Index (TLI) = 0.990; Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.990; Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.025; Confidence Interval (CI) = 90%. In this study, the ECR-R-Brazil had a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.64 for men and 0.57 for women.
3) Mosmann, C., Wagner, Good., Sarriera, J. (2008). An excellent qualidade conjugal como preditora dos estilos educativos parentais. Revista Psicologia Lisboa, 22(2) http://datingranking.net/country-dating/, 161-182. Recuperado de- ): The latest conflict scale is actually split up into a few subscales: in the 1st, entitled “conflict-disagreement”, nine products are shown and must end up being analyzed on the a six-area Likert level about your frequency in which the reason why getting argument shown took place the very last 12 months, between “rarely” in order to half dozen “almost every date”. On the second subscale, entitled “conflict-aggression”, around three products are demonstrated dealing with the brand new concentration of problems, this type of must be analyzed toward good Likert level of five affairs anywhere between “never” so you’re able to five “always”. On the study to help you adapt the scale of English to Portuguese, a good Cronbach’s Alpha of 0.71 try found. Within this research, Cronbach’s beliefs had been 0.80 for males and you may 0.77 for ladies.
